Reliability and validity of popular research sources.
In the space provided in columns two and three of the following matrix, prepare a 50-100-word evaluation of both the reliability and validity of each of the sources listed:
2. General Motor's Company Web Site
3.American Psychological Association Web Site
4.Arizona Department of Health Services Web Site
6.Blog About Coffee
9.Academy of Management Journal© SolutionLibrary Inc. solutionlibary.com 9836dcf9d7 https://solutionlibrary.com/psychology/abnormal-psychology/reliability-and-validity-of-popular-research-sources-7drd
... is a scientific and professional organization that represents psychology in the United States. With 150,000 members, APA is the largest association of psychologists worldwide. So essentially, the website acts as a hub for these thousands of members to share ideas and research. I would say that the validity is very high - it has to be when it is a trusted source. The content on the page however might not have high reliability since different researchers might report on different findings, which might contradict each other. This is in no way a negative aspects, it just denotes the rich content and open discussions on the site.
azdhs.gov: This would be similar to the APA site in terms of validity - it is a resource page that people visit and trust. The content must be approved before being submitted on the site. It is seen as very valid. I would say that it is also reliable - the research and findings posted on this site have probably been tested numerous times for it to merit being posted on the azdh website. A study done by only one researcher would probably not be published on a resource site for citizens - it would need to be repeated several times with similar results before it would be posted on this site.
http://www.cyberessays.com: Cyber Essays is your one-stop source for free, high-quality term papers, essays and reports on all subjects. As with Wikipedia, it consists of user-submitted materials. These are not verified by others, sources are not ...